Skip to main content

The miR-200 family in normal mammary gland development

Abstract

The miR-200 family of microRNAs plays a significant role in inhibiting mammary tumor growth and progression, and its members are being investigated as therapeutic targets. Additionally, if future studies can prove that miR-200s prevent mammary tumor initiation, the microRNA family could also offer a preventative strategy. Before utilizing miR-200s in a therapeutic setting, understanding how they regulate normal mammary development is necessary. No studies investigating the role of miR-200s in embryonic ductal development could be found, and only two studies examined the impact of miR-200s on pubertal ductal morphogenesis. These studies showed that miR-200s are expressed at low levels in virgin mammary glands, and elevated expression of miR-200s have the potential to impair ductal morphogenesis. In contrast to virgin mammary glands, miR-200s are expressed at high levels in mammary glands during late pregnancy and lactation. miR-200s are also found in the milk of several mammalian species, including humans. However, the relevance of miR-200s in milk remains unclear. The increase in miR-200 expression in late pregnancy and lactation suggests a role for miR-200s in the development of alveoli and/or regulating milk production. Therefore, studies investigating the consequence of miR-200 overexpression or knockdown are needed to identify the function of miR-200s in alveolar development and lactation.

Background

Mammals evolved mammary glands to generate milk to nourish their offspring. Milk is a complex solution containing proteins, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins and other nutrients that satisfy the nutritional needs of offspring [1]. While mammary gland development has been studied to understand this normal physiological process, these studies are also important for cancer researchers as several of the processes involved in generating a fully functional mammary gland such as proliferation, differentiation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), migration, and invasion, are hijacked by cancer cells [2,3,4,5]. The impact of genes, hormones and growth factors on ductal morphogenesis and alveolar development have been extensively investigated, while studies on non-coding RNAs such as microRNAs are less well characterized.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNA molecules 19–22 nucleotides (nt) long [6, 7]. miRNAs are initially transcribed as long primary transcripts that are processed by the ribonucleases Drosha [8, 9] and Dicer [8, 10, 11] into their mature 19–22nt duplexes [8, 12]. Mature miRNAs are incorporated into an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) [8] where they bind to the 3’-UTRs of mRNAs primarily using the miRNA seed region (nucleotides 2–8 of the miRNA) [8, 10, 11, 13, 14]. RISC complex binding to target mRNAs typically induces mRNA destabilization and translational repression [8, 10, 11, 13]. Each miRNA is predicted to target tens, hundreds, or thousands of mRNAs [15].

The miR-200 family consists of five members, miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-141, and miR-429 [16]. miR-200c and miR-141 are located on chromosome 12 in humans and chromosome 6 in mice [17]. miR-200b, miR-200a, and miR-429 are located on chromosome 1 in humans and chromosome 4 in mice [17]. The miR-200 family can be further characterized by seed sequences that separate the members into two functional groups. miR-200b, miR-200c, and miR-429 exhibit an identical seed sequence: AAUACUG [17]. Likewise, miR-200a and miR-141 share the seed sequence: AACACUG. The seed sequences of the two functional groups only differ by a single nucleotide (underlined) [17].

One of the main functions of the miR-200 family is influencing EMT. EMT is a biological process that causes polarized epithelial cells which interact with the basement membrane to lose their inter-cellular adhesion and acquire a mesenchymal cell phenotype [18,19,20,21]. This new phenotype has enhanced migratory capacity, invasiveness, and resistance to apoptosis [19,20,21]. EMT occurs in normal physiological events such as embryogenesis [22, 23], branching morphogenesis [24,25,26,27], and involution [28]. However, EMT is also implicated in abnormal physiological events such as tumorigenesis and metastasis [25, 29,30,31,32].

miR-200 expression appears to be controlled primarily by transcription factors such as Zeb1 and Zeb2 that directly bind to the promoter regions of the miR-200 clusters and repress transcription [33,34,35]. The miR-200 family and EMT-inducing transcription factors exist in a reciprocal negative feedback loop [24]. As a result, increasing miR-200 levels reduces EMT-inducing transcription factors. DNA methylation and histone H3 methylation also reduce miR-200 expression [36,37,38,39,40,41]; thus, inhibitors of DNA methylation or histone methylation should increase miR-200 expression. It has also been shown that compounds such as cryptotanshinone, phthalates, dihydrotanshinone, alkylphenols, and retinoic acid affect miR-200 levels [42,43,44].

The miR-200 family has been extensively studied in mammary tumorigenesis, particularly the claudin-low breast cancer subtype by our lab [41, 45, 46] and others [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. From this research, it has been postulated that miR-200s may serve as therapeutic targets for the treatment or prevention of breast cancer. If miR-200s are to be used as therapeutic targets or preventative agents, it is important to understand the consequences that altering miR-200s may have on mammary gland development. This paper will provide the current state of the literature regarding the function of miR-200s in mammary ductal development and alveologenesis. For each stage, the general physiology of the mammary gland will be outlined, as will the known role of the miR-200 family.

Main text

The miR-200 family in embryonic and pubertal ductal morphogenesis

While most mammary ductal development occurs postnatally, the mammary ductal network is initiated in the embryo during mid-gestation in mammals [27, 61, 62]. In rodents, bands of ectodermal cells form along the mammary lines around embryonic day 11 (E11), and early mammary buds develop by E12.5 [27, 63, 64]. These mammary buds will continue to develop into an ectodermal stalk that extends into the mammary fat pad by E15.5 [27]. Programmed cell death removes cells from the centre of this stalk, creating a lumen in the centre of the duct [27]. The bifurcation of the stalk generates the initial ductal tree consisting of 10–15 branches by parturition [61]. Embryonic ductal development is regulated by many growth factors and hormones, including fibroblast growth factors, Wnt proteins and Hedgehog proteins that, in turn, regulate Gata3, Hox, Tbx3, and Gli3 transcription factors [25, 27]. After birth, mammary ductal development is considered quiescent relative to embryonic and pubertal stages as the ductal growth rate matches normal body growth [2, 65, 66]. In response to pubertal hormones such as estrogen and progesterone, multilayer structures known as terminal end buds (TEBs) develop on the leading edge of the mammary duct and drive ductal elongation and bifurcation [66,67,68]. TEBs are composed of progenitor cells that eventually give rise to a single layer of luminal epithelial cells surrounded by a basal layer, including myoepithelial cells [69]. By the end of puberty, TEBs are no longer observable and the branched epithelium occupies 60% of the mammary stroma, leaving room for further expansion during lactation [70].

While no studies have evaluated the role of miR-200s during embryonic mammary ductal morphogenesis, a limited number of studies have evaluated miR-200s in post-natal ductal development. Avril-Sassen et al. evaluated miRNA expression in whole murine mammary glands at different developmental stages and found miR-200a, miR-141, and miR-429 to be expressed at low levels in juvenile, pubertal, and mature virgin mammary glands (Fig. 1) [71]. The expression of miR-200b and miR-200c were not reported [71].

Fig. 1
figure1

adapted from Macias & Hink [70]

Illustrating the generalized trends of miR-200 expression throughout the main stages of mammary gland development. miR-200 expression is relatively low in the newborn, pubertal, and virgin mammary gland when EMT is a dominant process [71]. miR-200 expression increases throughout pregnancy, peaking during lactation and remaining high during involution to facilitate alveologenesis and support lactation [71, 75,76,77,78]. Mammary gland illustrations

A study by Shimono et al. investigated mammary ductal development by transplanting 50,000 murine mammary epithelial cells infected with a miR-200c expressing lentivirus or a control lentivirus into the cleared fat pad of a syngeneic mouse [35]. While 11/20 transplants infected with the control lentivirus gave rise to a mammary ductal network, only 1/18 of the transplants infected with the miR-200c expressing lentivirus generated a mammary ductal tree [35]. Six of the miR-200c infected transplants produced small, disorganized clusters of cells. Staining of the transplants for myoepithelial cell marker keratin 14 (Krt14) and luminal cell marker keratin 18 (Krt18) revealed that the control infected transplants contain cells that were either Krt14 positive or Krt18 positive while the miR-200c infected transplants contained primarily Krt14 positive cells. This finding suggests that miR-200c promoted differentiation into myoepithelial cells rather than luminal cells.

The only study that evaluated miR-200s in human breast tissue was performed on reduction mammoplasty tissue. Bockmeyer et al. found that miR-200s are primarily expressed in luminal epithelial cells with lower levels of expression in myoepithelial cells [72].

Although these conclusions are based on a very small number of studies, it appears that miR-200s play a minor role in regulating ductal morphogenesis in virgin mice. Low levels of miR-200 family members throughout ductal morphogenesis [71] could indicate the presence of EMT-inducing transcription factors facilitating developmental changes requiring a mesenchymal cell phenotype [20]. Looking at this biological mechanism through the lens of breast cancer therapeutics, upregulating miR-200s in potential treatments could reduce necessary EMT-inducing transcription factors at this stage (ex. Zeb1, Zeb2). As Shimono et al. have begun to demonstrate, elevated expression of miR-200s may impair ductal elongation [35] and mammary trees favouring differentiation into myoepithelial cells over luminal cells would have later consequences during lactation. However, more research is required to determine whether elevated miR-200s delay or disrupt pubertal ductal morphogenesis and to define the mechanisms through which miR-200s impart this phenotype.

The miR-200 family in alveologenesis

The first transformation seen in early pregnancy is an increase of ductal branching in preparation for alveolar development [70]. Proliferating epithelial cells produce alveolar buds which develop into alveoli [70]. Cellular differentiation becomes a dominant process at mid-pregnancy as cells prepare for lactation [73]. Hormonal stimulation to produce milk begins around day 16 of pregnancy in mice and is stimulated by estrogen, progesterone, and prolactin [74]. At the completion of lactation, weaning results in a lack of demand for breast milk causing the milk to stagnate within the epithelium. This initiates mammary involution, which remodels the extensive epithelial alveolar network back to its simple ductal structure exhibited before pregnancy [70].

Avril-Sassen et al. found that the expression of miR-200a, miR-141 and miR-429 were expressed at higher levels in whole murine mammary glands during pregnancy compared to virgin mammary glands and a further increase in miR-200a, miR-141 and miR-429 expression was observed in lactating mammary glands [71]. The levels of miR-200a, miR-141 and miR-429 remained highly expressed during involution [71].

Similarly, a study by Nagaoka et al. found that miR-200a expression increased in mid-pregnant murine mammary glands (gestation day 14) compared to virgin mammary glands and further increased in lactating mammary glands [75]. The increase in miR-200a expression in lactating mammary glands was associated with an increase in Csn2 and Cdh1 expression and a decrease in Vim expression [75]. Moreover, this group found that the normal mouse mammary epithelial cell line, EpH4, showed an increase in miR-200a expression as well as Csn2 and Cdh1 expression following treatment with a mixture of lactogenic hormones [75]. Knockdown of miR-200a in EpH4 cells prior to treatment with lactogenic hormones significantly decreased Csn2 and Cdh1 expression compared to control cells [75].

Galio et al. investigated mouse mammary tissue collected from virgin mice as well as mice during early pregnancy, late pregnancy, early lactation, and late lactation [76]. miR-200a, miR-200b, and miR-200c showed a similar expression profile with low levels of expression in virgin and early pregnancy mammary glands with increased expression in mammary glands during late pregnancy and lactation [76]. Mammary glands during late lactation had the highest expression of miR-200a, miR-200b, and miR-200c [76]. miR-141 and miR-429 expression were low in virgin and early gestation mammary glands and increased in late pregnancy and lactating mammary glands; however, the expression of miR-141 and miR-429 peaked in mammary glands during early lactation [76].

The increase in miR-200 expression during alveologenesis has also been observed in species other than mice. Galio et al. evaluated miRNA expression in cycling ovine mammary glands as well as ovine mammary glands during early, mid, and late pregnancy as well as during lactation [76]. miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c, and miR-141 were all shown to increase in expression in mammary glands during late gestation compared to the estrous cycling mammary gland with a further increase in lactating mammary glands [76]. Le Guillou et al. studied the mammary gland miRNA expression in bovines during lactation, revealing that miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c, and miR-141 were among the 30 most highly expressed microRNAs in mammary epithelial tissue [77]. Li et al. also found increased expression of miR-200c and miR-141 in lactating compared to non-lactating bovine mammary tissue [78]. Consistent with the increased miR-200 expression in mammary glands observed during lactation, miR-200 family members are also found at high levels in milk from humans [1, 79], mice [1], cows [1, 80], pigs [1, 81], and wallabies [1].

These studies consistently demonstrate that miR-200s increase in expression in mammary tissue during pregnancy and achieve peak expression during lactation. miR-200s, as well as other miRNAs, can be found in the milk of several species but whether there are any functional consequences of miR-200s in milk remains unknown (Fig. 1). One study found that miR-200c was found in bovine milk, but bovine miR-200c was not present in the circulation of individuals who drank bovine milk suggesting that milk miR-200s are unlikely to have significant physiological functions in newborns [82]. This finding by Auerbach et al. suggests that a miR-200-altering breast cancer treatment may not cause undue harm to the normal physiology of a newborn feeding from a mother with breast cancer. If future research can further support this hypothesis, safe breastfeeding throughout treatment would be a unique property of miR-200 therapeutics. Breast cancer patients receiving traditional chemotherapy and hormone therapies are discouraged from breastfeeding as anti-cancer medications (ex. Doxorubicin, Cisplatin, Mitoxantrone, Methotrexate) [83] and hormone receptor modulators (ex. Tamoxifen) [84] can be transferred to the infant through breastmilk with toxic effects. Surgical removal of breast tissue (lumpectomy or single mastectomy) under general anesthesia may also allow for safe breastfeeding [85, 86]; however, these treatment options may not be sufficient for aggressive subtypes of breast cancer. For an individual with breast cancer, a miR-200-altering therapy is unlikely to produce off-target effects on their normal mammary physiology throughout pregnancy and lactation as miR-200 levels are already high during the two developmental stages.

miR-200 mRNA targets and mammary gland development

miR-200 family members exert their effects by binding to mRNA transcripts matching their seed sequence and repressing translation to prevent/reduce mRNA-specific protein synthesis [8, 10, 11, 13]. There are thousands of mRNAs targeted by miR-200s as Bracken et al. found 917 transcripts directly bound to miR-200a and 1,194 transcripts directly bound to miR-200b [87]. Among the miR-200 mRNA targets, Ctnnb1, Zeb1, Zeb2, Snai1, Snai2, and Twist will be discussed based on their importance throughout mammary gland development.

The finding by Shimono et al. that overexpressing miR-200c impaired the elongation of mammary ductal trees [35] can be understood by investigating miR-200 mRNA targets. Thus far, miR-200a [88, 89], miR-200b [90, 91], miR-200c [90, 92], and miR-141 [90] have been found to inhibit β-catenin (Ctnnb1) activation by targeting its mRNA. β-catenin inhibition prevents activation of transcription factor TCF which mediates the growth and proliferation outcomes of the Wnt signaling pathway [93]. Postnatally, Uyttendaele et al. found that Wnt-1 is involved in mammary branching morphogenesis by overcoming Notch-mediated inhibition [94]. For successful Wnt-mediated branching morphogenesis, miR-200 levels must be low which Avril-Sassen et al. confirmed for pubertal morphogenesis [71]. miR-200 members also bind to the mRNA of EMT-associated transcription factors Zeb1 and Zeb2 [34]. As epithelial cells invade the underlying matrix during pubertal ductal morphogenesis, it is hypothesized that cells undergo partial-EMT [26], and EMT-inducing transcription factors have been detected at TEBs during puberty [27]. This invasion would not be possible if cells remained in an epithelial cell phenotype promoted by miR-200s based on cell-adhesion to the basement membrane.

While stages leading up to pregnancy require low miR-200 expression, peaking miR-200s during and after pregnancy is essential for lactation and is facilitated by interactions with mRNA targets. An epithelial cell morphology within the lactiferous ducts is required during lactation as luminal cells must establish and maintain apical/basal polarity to function as secretory cells. Mesenchymal transcription factors Zeb1, Zeb2, [34, 95] Snai1, Snai2, and Twist [95] have been identified as direct targets of miR-200 family members based on their mRNA sequences. Watson et al. have also demonstrated miR-200s’ ability to significantly reduce the expression of Zeb1, Snai1, Twist1, and Twist2 [45]. Zeb1, Zeb2, and Snai1 proteins bind directly to the Cdh1 promoter to repress its transcription while Twist proteins repress Cdh1 indirectly [96]. Cdh1 is essential for lactation and Boussadia et al. demonstrated that Cdh1 gene deletion impacted terminal differentiation of the lactating mammary gland. Cdh1 gene deletion reduced milk production so significantly that adult mouse mothers could not suckle their offspring [74]. miR-200s translational repression of EMT-associated transcription factors through mRNA interaction prevents Cdh1n repression, contributing to successful lactation.

Based on the extensive number of mRNA targets by the miR-200 family, understanding their impact on the Wnt signaling pathway via β-catenin and EMT via Zeb, Snai1, Snai2, and Twist is just scratching the surface of understanding this microRNA family. However, these pathways serve as avenues for future research to further understand the impact of miR-200s on normal mammary gland development.

Conclusions

During mammary ductal morphogenesis, where the percentage of progenitor cells is relatively high and cell migration and invasion are required for mammary ductal elongation, it appears that the expression of miR-200s is low. The results reported by Shimono et al. provide preliminary evidence that increased expression of one or more miR-200 family members can impair ductal elongation potentially by interacting with the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and/or inhibiting EMT. However, supporting evidence is required to further substantiate these claims and confirm the biological mechanisms at play. Increased expression of miR-200 family members during a potential cancer therapy may consequently impair ductal morphogenesis. While breast cancer is rare in adolescents undergoing pubertal branching morphogenesis, it must be considered for post-pubertal individuals experiencing ductal morphogenesis associated with cyclic ovarian stimulation in preparation for lactation. Studies analyzing mammary duct length and area of miR-200 knockdown mice would provide valuable insights on the impact of miR-200-altering therapeutics on normal mammary development. Alveologenesis in late pregnancy and maintenance of alveoli structure and function during lactation are associated with increased expression of miR-200s. As mammary epithelial cells are terminally differentiated during alveolar development, the increase in miR-200s during this process is consistent with the observation that miR-200s are associated with maintaining an epithelial cell identity. While increased expression of miR-200s in alveoli is consistently observed, the requirement of miR-200 for proper alveolar development and the functions of miR-200s in alveolar epithelial cells have yet to be determined. Therefore, studies overexpressing or knocking down/knocking out miR-200s during different mammary developmental stages are required to determine the functional roles of miR-200s in the mammary gland. Future research should also focus on EMT-associated transcription factors such as Zeb, Snai1, Snai2, and Twist [33,34,35] to understand the complete picture of the miR-200 family throughout normal mammary development. Finally, studies providing insights into the mechanisms through which miR-200s impair mammary tumor initiation, growth and progression will help determine whether increased expression of miR-200s has the potential to serve as a therapeutic or preventative strategy for breast cancer.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

Cdh1:

E-cadherin

EMT:

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

Krt14:

Keratin 14

Krt18:

Keratin 18

miRNAs:

MicroRNAs

RISC:

RNA-induced silencing complex

TEB:

Terminal end bud

References

  1. 1.

    Lefevre C, Venkat P, Kumar A, Modepalli V, Nicholas KR. Comparative analysis of milk microRNA in the therian lineage highlights the evolution of lactation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2019;31(7):1266–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Huebner RJ, Ewald AJ. Cellular foundations of mammary tubulogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;31C:124–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Iber D, Menshykau D. The control of branching morphogenesis. Open Biol. 2013;3(9):130088.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Affolter M, Zeller R, Caussinus E. Tissue remodelling through branching morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(12):831–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hutvagner G, McLachlan J, Pasquinelli AE, Balint E, Tuschl T, Zamore PD. A cellular function for the RNA-interference enzyme Dicer in the maturation of the let-7 small temporal RNA. Science. 2001;293(5531):834–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Grishok A, Pasquinelli AE, Conte D, Li N, Parrish S, Ha I, Baillie DL, Fire A, Ruvkun G, Mello CC. Genes and mechanisms related to RNA interference regulate expression of the small temporal RNAs that control C. elegans developmental timing. Cell. 2001;106(1):23–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Di LG, Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNAs: fundamental facts and involvement in human diseases. Birth Defects ResCEmbryoToday. 2006;78(2):180–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kim VN, Nam JW. Genomics of microRNA. Trends Genet. 2006;22(3):165–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Czech B, Hannon GJ. Small RNA sorting: matchmaking for Argonautes. NatRevGenet. 2011;12(1):19–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chendrimada TP, Gregory RI, Kumaraswamy E, Norman J, Cooch N, Nishikura K, Shiekhattar R. TRBP recruits the Dicer complex to Ago2 for microRNA processing and gene silencing. Nature. 2005;436(7051):740–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hock J, Meister G. The Argonaute protein family. Genome Biol. 2008;9(2):210.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(2):102–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Croce CM. Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(10):704–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Saini HK, Enright AJ, Griffiths-Jones S. Annotation of mammalian primary microRNAs. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:564.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Trumbach D, Prakash N. The conserved miR-8/miR-200 microRNA family and their role in invertebrate and vertebrate neurogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;359(1):161–77.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Georgakopoulos-Soares I, Chartoumpekis DV, Kyriazopoulou V, Zaravinos A. EMT factors and metabolic pathways in cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:499.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(6):1420–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kalluri R. EMT: when epithelial cells decide to become mesenchymal-like cells. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(6):1417–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(3):178–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Piao HL, Ma L. Non-coding RNAs as regulators of mammary development and breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012;17(1):33–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Propper AY. Wandering epithelial cells in the rabbit embryo milk line. A preliminary scanning electron microscope study. Dev Biol. 1978;67(1):225–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Brabletz S, Brabletz T. The ZEB/miR-200 feedback loop–a motor of cellular plasticity in development and cancer? EMBO Rep. 2010;11(9):670–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wansbury O, Mackay A, Kogata N, Mitsopoulos C, Kendrick H, Davidson K, Ruhrberg C, Reis-Filho JS, Smalley MJ, Zvelebil M, et al. Transcriptome analysis of embryonic mammary cells reveals insights into mammary lineage establishment. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(4):R79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kim DH, Xing T, Yang Z, Dudek R, Lu Q, Chen YH. Epithelial mesenchymal transition in embryonic development, tissue repair and cancer: a comprehensive overview. J Clin Med. 2017;7(1):1.

  27. 27.

    Slepicka PF, Somasundara AVH, Dos Santos CO. The molecular basis of mammary gland development and epithelial differentiation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2021,114:93–112.

  28. 28.

    Zhang H, Liu Y, Weng J, Usuda K, Fujii K, Watanabe G, Nagaoka K. Decrease of lactogenic hormones induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition via TGFbeta1 and arachidonic acid during mammary gland involution. J Reprod Dev. 2017;63(3):325–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009;139(5):871–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kroger C, Afeyan A, Mraz J, Eaton EN, Reinhardt F, Khodor YL, Thiru P, Bierie B, Ye X, Burge CB, et al. Acquisition of a hybrid E/M state is essential for tumorigenicity of basal breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(15):7353–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jolly MK, Boareto M, Huang B, Jia D, Lu M, Ben-Jacob E, Onuchic JN, Levine H. Implications of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype in metastasis. Front Oncol. 2015;5:155.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pastushenko I, Brisebarre A, Sifrim A, Fioramonti M, Revenco T, Boumahdi S, Van Keymeulen A, Brown D, Moers V, Lemaire S, et al. Identification of the tumour transition states occurring during EMT. Nature. 2018;556(7702):463–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Feng X, Wang Z, Fillmore R, Xi Y. MiR-200, a new star miRNA in human cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;344(2):166–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Park SM, Gaur AB, Lengyel E, Peter ME. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008;22(7):894–907.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shimono Y, Zabala M, Cho RW, Lobo N, Dalerba P, Qian D, Diehn M, Liu H, Panula SP, Chiao E, et al. Downregulation of miRNA-200c links breast cancer stem cells with normal stem cells. Cell. 2009;138(3):592–603.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Vrba L, Garbe JC, Stampfer MR, Futscher BW. Epigenetic regulation of normal human mammary cell type-specific miRNAs. Genome Res. 2011;21(12):2026–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wiklund ED, Bramsen JB, Hulf T, Dyrskjot L, Ramanathan R, Hansen TB, Villadsen SB, Gao S, Ostenfeld MS, Borre M, et al. Coordinated epigenetic repression of the miR-200 family and miR-205 in invasive bladder cancer. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(6):1327–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Neves R, Scheel C, Weinhold S, Honisch E, Iwaniuk KM, Trompeter HI, Niederacher D, Wernet P, Santourlidis S, Uhrberg M. Role of DNA methylation in miR-200c/141 cluster silencing in invasive breast cancer cells. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:219.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Davalos V, Moutinho C, Villanueva A, Boque R, Silva P, Carneiro F, Esteller M. Dynamic epigenetic regulation of the microRNA-200 family mediates epithelial and mesenchymal transitions in human tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2012;31(16):2062–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lim YY, Wright JA, Attema JL, Gregory PA, Bert AG, Smith E, Thomas D, Lopez AF, Drew PA, Khew-Goodall Y, et al. Epigenetic modulation of the miR-200 family is associated with transition to a breast cancer stem-cell-like state. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(Pt 10):2256–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jones R, Watson K, Bruce A, Nersesian S, Kitz J, Moorehead R. Re-expression of miR-200c suppresses proliferation, colony formation and in vivo tumor growth of murine claudin-low mammary tumor cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(14):23727–49.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Su YS, Kuo MZ, Kuo YT, Huang SW, Lee CJ, Su ZY, Ni YH, Li DK, Wu TY. Diterpenoid anthraquinones as chemopreventive agents altered microRNA and transcriptome expressions in cancer cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;136:111260.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Patino-Garcia D, Cruz-Fernandes L, Bunay J, Orellana R, Moreno RD. Daily exposure to phthalates and alkylphenols alters miR biogenesis and expression in mice ovaries. J Mol Endocrinol. 2020;65(4):175–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Zhang J, Gao Y, Yu M, Wu H, Ai Z, Wu Y, Liu H, Du J, Guo Z, Zhang Y. Retinoic acid induces embryonic stem cell differentiation by altering both encoding RNA and microRNA expression. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0132566.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Watson KL, Jones RA, Bruce A, Moorehead RA. The miR-200b/200a/429 cluster prevents metastasis and induces dormancy in a murine claudin-low mammary tumor cell line. Exp Cell Res. 2018;369(1):17–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Simpson K, Conquer-van Heumen G, Watson KL, Roth M, Martin CJ, Moorehead RA. Re-expression of miR-200s in claudin-low mammary tumor cells alters cell shape and reduces proliferation and invasion potentially through modulating other miRNAs and SUZ12 regulated genes. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):89.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Knezevic J, Pfefferle AD, Petrovic I, Greene SB, Perou CM, Rosen JM. Expression of miR-200c in claudin-low breast cancer alters stem cell functionality, enhances chemosensitivity and reduces metastatic potential. Oncogene. 2015;34(49):5997–6006.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ljepoja B, Schreiber C, Gegenfurtner FA, Garcia-Roman J, Kohler B, Zahler S, Radler JO, Wagner E, Roidl A. Inducible microRNA-200c decreases motility of breast cancer cells and reduces filamin A. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(11):e0224314.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hurteau GJ, Carlson JA, Spivack SD, Brock GJ. Overexpression of the microRNA hsa-miR-200c leads to reduced expression of transcription factor 8 and increased expression of E-cadherin. Cancer Res. 2007;67(17):7972–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Zhang T, Wan JG, Liu JB, Deng M. MiR-200c inhibits metastasis of breast tumor via the downregulation of Foxf2. Genet Mol Res GMR. 2017;16(3). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4238/gmr16038971.

  51. 51.

    Zhang J, Li G, Chen Y, Fang L, Guan C, Bai F, Ma M, Lyu J, Meng QH. Metformin inhibits tumorigenesis and tumor growth of breast cancer cells by upregulating miR-200c but downregulating AKT2 expression. J Cancer. 2017;8(10):1849–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Chang BP, Wang DS, Xing JW, Yang SH, Chu Q, Yu SY. miR-200c inhibits metastasis of breast cancer cells by targeting HMGB1. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci. 2014;34(2):201–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Luo D, Wilson JM, Harvel N, Liu J, Pei L, Huang S, Hawthorn L, Shi H. A systematic evaluation of miRNA:mRNA interactions involved in the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells. J Transl Med. 2013;11:57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ren Y, Han X, Yu K, Sun S, Zhen L, Li Z, Wang S. microRNA-200c downregulates XIAP expression to suppress proliferation and promote apoptosis of triple-negative breast cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 2014;10(1):315–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kim HK, Park JD, Choi SH, Shin DJ, Hwang S, Jung HY, Park KS. Functional link between miR-200a and ELK3 regulates the metastatic nature of breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(5):1225.

  56. 56.

    Yuan J, Xiao C, Lu H, Yu H, Hong H, Guo C, Wu Z. miR-200b regulates breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion by targeting radixin. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19(4):2741–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Li D, Wang H, Song H, Xu H, Zhao B, Wu C, Hu J, Wu T, Xie D, Zhao J, et al. The microRNAs miR-200b-3p and miR-429-5p target the LIMK1/CFL1 pathway to inhibit growth and motility of breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(49):85276–89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zheng Q, Cui X, Zhang D, Yang Y, Yan X, Liu M, Niang B, Aziz F, Liu S, Yan Q, et al. miR-200b inhibits proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer by targeting fucosyltransferase IV and alpha1,3-fucosylated glycans. Oncogenesis. 2017;6(7):e358.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Hong H, Yu H, Yuan J, Guo C, Cao H, Li W, Xiao C. MicroRNA-200b impacts breast cancer cell migration and invasion by regulating ezrin-radixin-moesin. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:1946–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Pang Y, Liu J, Li X, Xiao G, Wang H, Yang G, Li Y, Tang SC, Qin S, Du N, et al. MYC and DNMT3A-mediated DNA methylation represses microRNA-200b in triple negative breast cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(12):6262–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Cowin P, Wysolmerski J. Molecular mechanisms guiding embryonic mammary gland development. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2010;2(6):a003251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hens JR, Wysolmerski JJ. Key stages of mammary gland development: molecular mechanisms involved in the formation of the embryonic mammary gland. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(5):220–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Veltmaat JM, Van Veelen W, Thiery JP, Bellusci S. Identification of the mammary line in mouse by Wnt10b expression. Dev Dyn. 2004;229(2):349–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Watson CJ, Khaled WT. Mammary development in the embryo and adult: a journey of morphogenesis and commitment. Development. 2008;135(6):995–1003.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hogg NA, Harrison CJ, Tickle C. Lumen formation in the developing mouse mammary gland. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1983;73:39–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Sternlicht MD, Kouros-Mehr H, Lu P, Werb Z. Hormonal and local control of mammary branching morphogenesis. Differentiation. 2006;74(7):365–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    McNally S, Martin F. Molecular regulators of pubertal mammary gland development. Ann Med. 2011;43(3):212–34.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Sternlicht MD. Key stages in mammary gland development: the cues that regulate ductal branching morphogenesis. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8(1):201.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Daniel CW, Strickland P, Friedmann Y. Expression and functional role of E- and P-cadherins in mouse mammary ductal morphogenesis and growth. Dev Biol. 1995;169(2):511–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Macias H, Hinck L. Mammary gland development. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2012;1(4):533–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Avril-Sassen S, Goldstein LD, Stingl J, Blenkiron C, Le Quesne J, Spiteri I, Karagavriilidou K, Watson CJ, Tavare S, Miska EA, et al. Characterisation of microRNA expression in post-natal mouse mammary gland development. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:548.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Bockmeyer CL, Christgen M, Muller M, Fischer S, Ahrens P, Langer F, Kreipe H, Lehmann U. MicroRNA profiles of healthy basal and luminal mammary epithelial cells are distinct and reflected in different breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer ResTreat. 2011;130(3):735–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Oakes SR, Hilton HN, Ormandy CJ. The alveolar switch: coordinating the proliferative cues and cell fate decisions that drive the formation of lobuloalveoli from ductal epithelium. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8(2):207.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Boussadia O, Kutsch S, Hierholzer A, Delmas V, Kemler R. E-cadherin is a survival factor for the lactating mouse mammary gland. Mech Dev. 2002;115(1–2):53–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Nagaoka K, Zhang H, Watanabe G, Taya K. Epithelial cell differentiation regulated by MicroRNA-200a in mammary glands. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65127.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Galio L, Droineau S, Yeboah P, Boudiaf H, Bouet S, Truchet S, Devinoy E. MicroRNA in the ovine mammary gland during early pregnancy: spatial and temporal expression of miR-21, miR-205, and miR-200. Physiol Genomics. 2013;45(4):151–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Le Guillou S, Marthey S, Laloe D, Laubier J, Mobuchon L, Leroux C, Le Provost F. Characterisation and comparison of lactating mouse and bovine mammary gland miRNomes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e91938.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Li Z, Liu H, Jin X, Lo L, Liu J. Expression profiles of microRNAs from lactating and non-lactating bovine mammary glands and identification of miRNA related to lactation. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:731.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Zhou Q, Li M, Wang X, Li Q, Wang T, Zhu Q, Zhou X, Wang X, Gao X, Li X. Immune-related microRNAs are abundant in breast milk exosomes. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(1):118–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Do DN, Li R, Dudemaine PL, Ibeagha-Awemu EM. MicroRNA roles in signalling during lactation: an insight from differential expression, time course and pathway analyses of deep sequence data. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44605.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Gu Y, Li M, Wang T, Liang Y, Zhong Z, Wang X, Zhou Q, Chen L, Lang Q, He Z, et al. Lactation-related microRNA expression profiles of porcine breast milk exosomes. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8):e43691.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Auerbach A, Vyas G, Li A, Halushka M, Witwer K. Uptake of dietary milk miRNAs by adult humans: a validation study. F1000Res. 2016;5:721.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Pistilli B, Bellettini G, Giovannetti E, Codacci-Pisanelli G, Azim HA Jr, Benedetti G, Sarno MA, Peccatori FA. Chemotherapy, targeted agents, antiemetics and growth-factors in human milk: how should we counsel cancer patients about breastfeeding? Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39(3):207–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Peccatori FA, Codacci-Pisanelli G, Mellgren G, Buonomo B, Baldassarre E, Lien EA, Bifulco E, Hustad S, Zachariassen E, Johansson H, et al. First-in-human pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen and its metabolites in the milk of a lactating mother: a case study. ESMO Open. 2020;5(5):e000859.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Nitsun M, Szokol JW, Saleh HJ, Murphy GS, Vender JS, Luong L, Raikoff K, Avram MJ. Pharmacokinetics of midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl transfer to human breast milk. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;79(6):549–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Cobb B, Liu R, Valentine E, Onuoha O. Breastfeeding after anesthesia: a review for anesthesia providers regarding the transfer of medications into breast milk. Transl Perioper Pain Med. 2015;1(2):1–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Bracken CP, Li X, Wright JA, Lawrence DM, Pillman KA, Salmanidis M, Anderson MA, Dredge BK, Gregory PA, Tsykin A, et al. Genome-wide identification of miR-200 targets reveals a regulatory network controlling cell invasion. EMBO J. 2014;33(18):2040–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Saydam O, Shen Y, Wurdinger T, Senol O, Boke E, James MF, Tannous BA, Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Yi M, Stephens RM, et al. Downregulated microRNA-200a in meningiomas promotes tumor growth by reducing E-cadherin and activating the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29(21):5923–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Su J, Zhang A, Shi Z, Ma F, Pu P, Wang T, Zhang J, Kang C, Zhang Q. MicroRNA-200a suppresses the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway by interacting with beta-catenin. Int J Oncol. 2012;40(4):1162–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Tang H, Kong Y, Guo J, Tang Y, Xie X, Yang L, Su Q, Xie X. Diallyl disulfide suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in human gastric cancer through Wnt-1 signaling pathway by up-regulation of miR-200b and miR-22. Cancer Lett. 2013;340(1):72–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Wang Z, Humphries B, Xiao H, Jiang Y, Yang C. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in arsenic-transformed cells promotes angiogenesis through activating beta-catenin-vascular endothelial growth factor pathway. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013;271(1):20–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Cong J, Gong J, Yang C, Xia Z, Zhang H. MiR-200c/FUT4 axis prevents the proliferation of colon cancer cells by downregulating the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    MacDonald BT, Tamai K, He X. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: components, mechanisms, and diseases. Dev Cell. 2009;17(1):9–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Uyttendaele H, Soriano JV, Montesano R, Kitajewski J. Notch4 and Wnt-1 proteins function to regulate branching morphogenesis of mammary epithelial cells in an opposing fashion. Dev Biol. 1998;196(2):204–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(22):14910–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Xu R, Won JY, Kim CH, Kim DE, Yim H. Roles of the phosphorylation of transcriptional factors in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Oncol. 2019;2019:5810465.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This work was funded by a CHIR project grant (PJT-162218) awarded to RAM.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MR wrote the manuscript while RAM edited the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger A. Moorehead.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roth, M.J., Moorehead, R.A. The miR-200 family in normal mammary gland development. BMC Dev Biol 21, 12 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12861-021-00243-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • microRNA
  • miR-200
  • Mammary development
  • Lactation
  • Cancer